Dr. Peter David Beter – Audio Letter 27: Soviet Attacks; Atomic Plague; Disarming USA- Oct. 29, 1977

Dr. Peter David Beter – Audio Letter 27: Soviet Attacks; Atomic Plague; Disarming USA- Oct. 29, 1977


Hello my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today
is Oct. 29, 1977, and this is my Audioletter No. 27. Fifteen
years ago yesterday, on Oct. 28, 1962, America breathed a sigh
of relief as the Cuban Missile Crisis ended in surrender by the Soviet
Union. On that Sunday morning, Radio Moscow announced that
all work on the offensive missile sites in Cuba was being
stopped and that they would be dismantled under United Nations observation–so
ended 6 days in which the world teetered visibly on
the brink of nuclear war, thanks to a dangerous Soviet gamble. The public crisis had begun with a televised
speech by President John F. Kennedy on Monday evening,
Oct. 22, 1962. Tens of millions of Americans huddled before our
TV sets, having been told in news reports all day long that something
big was afoot. When President Kennedy told us the Soviet
offensive nuclear missiles were almost operational in Cuba,
some Americans were taken by surprise, others were not. Those
who were not surprised had heard the warnings of the late Senator
Kenneth Keating of New York. For more than a year he had been warning
about the Cuban missiles in speeches nationwide. But many
other Americans were shocked to hear about the missiles from President
Kennedy that evening. Some had never heard Senator Keating’s
earlier warnings, thanks to a major media blackout
on the story. Others had heard but they had believed the denials
issued by the Government. But what was stunning to everyone,
the Kremlin included, was the response by President Kennedy
to the Cuban missile threat. Avoiding use of the word “blockade”
which in international law is an act of war, President
Kennedy announced a so-called quarantine on offensive shipments
to Cuba. It would be enforced by what was then the most powerful
navy on earth, the United States Navy. Furthermore, the President
demanded that the missile sites be dismantled and Soviet forces
withdrawn, otherwise stronger action by America was threatened.
Then came the bone-chilling words: “Any missile launched
from Cuba against any nation shall be regarded as an attack
by the Soviet Union on the United States, requiring full retaliation.”
Refusing to pretend that Cuba was the culprit, Jack Kennedy
confronted the Soviet Union head on and in terms of the one
thing that commands Soviet respect–military power. The great historian Carroll Quigley, who passed
away early this year, summarized the circumstances in
the Cuba crisis very accurately in his monumental work, “TRAGEDY
AND HOPE” published by MacMillan in 1966: “The dominant fact in the whole situation
was the overwhelming character of America’s power, and the fact
that this was known both to the White House and to the Kremlin
but was largely unknown and certainly unpublicized to the
world. Around the Soviet Union’s border were 144 Polaris, 103
Atlas, 159 Thor, Jupiter, and Titan missiles, 1600 long-range
bombers many of them constantly in the air with nuclear bombs.
When the President’s speech began the public crisis, 5 divisions
of the U.S. Army strategic reserve totaling about 100,000 men,
plus 100,000 Air Force and an equal number of Naval and Marine
personnel had been mobilized or alerted. The First Armored Division
had been flown from Texas to the east coast, 90 naval vessels
including 8 carriers were on patrol to blockade. A Cuban
invasion command had been assembled in Florida and 2700 relatives
of military personnel had been evacuated from Guantanamo.
Under such pressure Khrushchev wilted–it might almost
be said that he panicked–on Friday, October 26.” And two days later Radio Moscow made the announcement
giving in to Kennedy’s demands. Many critics have pointed
out that after the crisis itself, America seemingly left
needless loopholes for Soviet cheating in the Cuban withdrawal process.
But regardless of that, it was the overwhelming power of
America that prevented nuclear war in the Cuban crisis itself. Two years before the Cuban crisis, Gen. Nathan
Twining retiring as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs
of Staff, warned America: “Forces that cannot win will not
deter.” These few words of common sense distilled the lessons
of several thousand years of military history; and in October
1962 the Cuban missile crisis proved that they are as true in a nuclear
age as they ever were before. One would think that such a close
brush with nuclear disaster would have alerted the American
people to the realities of survival in an enduring way–but
it did not. The four to one military advantage over Russia
enjoyed by America in 1962 was not brought home to the American
public as the critical factor that had prevented a war. It was only
later in context with words like “over-kill”, “measured response”,
and “mutual assured destruction” that our previous military
preponderance was brought to public attention; and the purpose
then was to whittle it down to nothing. But if the American people failed to learn
the lesson of Cuba, the Kremlin did not. The lesson was learned
best of all by Leonid Brezhnev, Khrushchev’s rocket boss.
Khrushchev’s failure in the Cuban missile affair was the beginning
of the end for him in the Kremlin, yet ironically when Khrushchev
was deposed in 1964, it was none other than Brezhnev who
had actually masterminded the Cuban missile plan who took
Khrushchev’s place–and Brezhnev was determined that the
Soviet Union would not again suffer such a debacle. Today the similarities to the Cuban missile
crisis are striking. Now, as then, we are again targeted
with short-range nuclear missiles, except this time they are
lurking within our own territorial waters, ready for underwater
launch upon satellite command. Now, as then, the Soviet
missile crisis has been underway for more than a year, and the
American people are kept ignorant of the facts by the major media
blackout of the story and by government denials. And now,
as then, the dominant fact is the lopsided military advantage possessed
by one side– but this time it isn’t just missiles that
threaten us, it also includes underwater nuclear mines strewn throughout
our own country by Soviet agents. And again, the public
is being deceived jointly by the Federal government
and the controlled major media–not merely by silence and denial
but by propaganda that helps to cover up hostilities that are
already being directed against us by our enemy. Worst of
all, the lopsided military imbalance now favors not America
but the Soviet Union. During the past month unusually rapid, puzzling,
and dramatic changes have begun sweeping across the international
arena. In the Middle East, three years of Soviet eclipse
have suddenly been ended by joint Soviet/American declaration;
and, in the process, a drastic change in American policy toward
Israel has surfaced. Red China, after a decade of bitter struggling
with the Soviet Union, suddenly began making concrete moves
toward reconciliation with Russia early this month. India’s Prime
Minister Desai, who used to denounce Communism, traveled to Moscow
early this month and now says India’s friendship with the Soviet
Union is “cemented.” News and commentaries suddenly
assure us that a thaw is taking place between the Soviet Union and
the United States, and on all sides disarmament has all of a
sudden become the overriding topic in world affairs. These developments and many more have all
come about since America’s disastrous defeat by the Soviet
Union last month, on Sept. 27, 1977, in the still-secret Battle
of the Harvest Moon. This was history’s first full-fledged space
battle; and as I told you in detail last month in Audioletter No.
26, the Soviet Union emerged as the only possessor of the decisive
new Particle Beam weapon. It is this Soviet military breakthrough
that is at the root of what now looks like an avalanche of
diplomatic breakthroughs involving the Soviet Union all
over the world. As it stands now, my friends, the cold, hard
truth is this: The Soviet Union could attack the United States
now and win; but American retaliation could, nevertheless,
inflict considerable suffering on Russia as the price of such a
Soviet conquest–and they prefer to destroy us without suffering
themselves, and that is the direction in which events are now moving. My three topics for today are: Topic #1–THE
SOVIET PARTICLE BEAM AND KILLER SATELLITES; Topic #2–THE
SPREADING ATOMIC PLAGUE CALLED LEGIONNAIRE’S DISEASE; and Topic #3–THE
ENFORCED DISARMING OF AMERICA NOW UNDERWAY. Topic #1–Last month in Audioletter No. 26
recorded Sept. 30, 1977, I revealed the fact that the Soviet
Union has become the first nation on earth to possess a new super-weapon,
the Particle Beam, which is now deployed in earth orbit.
The first Particle Beam Killer Satellite was launched three months
ago on July 17, 1977, and is known as Cosmos 929. As I told you last month, the first operational
test against the target was carried out over the Soviet
Union during the early hours of Sept. 20, 1977. An American spy satellite
was blasted into a huge fireball that was seen hundreds
of miles away. Exactly two weeks later, on October 4, 1977,
Secretary of Defense Harold Brown held a news conference in which
he shocked everyone with the unexpected words: “There is a fact
of Soviet anti-satellite, not only development but operational
capability.” And he added: “That’s something of concern
to me because we rely a good deal on our space systems for support
of our military capability, which capability, I think, contributes
to deterring, preventing war.” After Dr. Brown spoke, other
Defense officials singled out our low-flying spy satellites
as being vulnerable to the Soviet killer satellites, which are also
known as Cosmos Interceptors. However, neither Dr. Brown nor
the other spokesmen would explain for the record and for the American
people how the new Cosmos Interceptors work. After all, the
Russians know! Reporters were therefore left with nothing
to suggest in their articles except the 10-year-old Soviet anti-satellite
concept of an explosive interceptor, which would maneuver
close to the target and then blow up. The fact that Particle
Beam weapons are involved was not mentioned. In January of this year the outgoing Pentagon
Research Director, Dr. Malcolm Currie, gave Congress
a warning. He said that it would be catastrophic to let the Soviets
gain an advantage over us in the area of anti-satellite
weapons. And no wonder. Satellites today play a central role
in the military communications, intelligence gathering, and
early warning of any possible attack. Unusual troop movements or
other preparations for attack can be detected, and even the firing
of ICBMs would be detected only by satellites. Without our spy
satellites, we would be blinded to any surprise attack by
strategic missiles; and yet the SALT II Accord, which Jimmy Carter
is now working so feverishly to promote, includes no provision
at all against anti-satellite weapons. As I reported in Audioletter No. 26 at the
end of last month, four days before Dr. Brown’s stunning announcement
about operational Soviet Killer Satellites, there
were two Cosmos 929 class Interceptors in orbit. Now there are
8! And now the Soviet Union is picking off American strategic
satellites one by one, creating a tremendous fireball each time
like the one I described to you last month. On October 13, earlier this month, CBS Radio
News reported that a number of people have expressed concern
about seeing several fireballs over Russia. They inquired
what they could be, thinking they might be UFOs from outer space.
But a Russian scientist who was interviewed about it said
the fireballs were nothing to worry about, that they were merely
Cosmos phenomena. And of course he was telling the truth in
a tongue-in-cheek way, since the recent astonishing fireball phenomena
are caused by Cosmos Particle Beam Interceptors. But the
granddaddy of all the fireballs so far was the one which erupted
over the United States on the evening of October 18, just eleven
days ago. Hundreds of witnesses reported seeing the huge fireball
all the way from the McDonald Observatory in extreme southwest
Texas to points over several hundred miles away in Arkansas and
Missouri, as well as in the neighboring states of Oklahoma and
Louisiana. It was so bright that people hundreds of miles apart
thought it had hit near them, and so huge that astronomers said
it should have reached the ground; but according to radar
and military observers, it exploded in mid air with a bright
flash. Whether any pieces survived and hit the ground is
not known at this time. Thus the 85-ton American space station known
as SKYLAB, launched four years ago, came to a spectacular end
at the hands of a Soviet Cosmos Interceptor. The Soviet Union
wanted to insure that Skylab could not be pressed into service
by America in any way to begin to undo the fast-growing Soviet
domination of space. And just in case any chunks of the big space
station should reach the ground without burning up, thereby possibly
doing damage or injury, Skylab was destroyed over the United
States instead of over the Soviet Union. Nine days later, the
Government released an elaborate cover story about Skylab by way
of the CBS Evening News for October 27, 1977. While we were shown
official NASA film of Skylab in orbit, we were told that
for some strange reason Skylab’s orbit is decaying sooner than
expected and that it might well come down prematurely. Now,
my friends, if someone should find pieces of it lying around, the
groundwork has already been laid for a future public explanation. The Soviet use of their new Particle Beam
weapon to blow our strategic satellites out of the sky is bad
enough, but this is only the beginning. As I explained in detail
last month, America’s secret Moon Base in Copernicus Crater
was put out of action on Sept. 27, 1977. It was bombarded
with a Soviet Neutron Particle Beam which killed all of our astronauts
there. The Copernicus base was itself equipped with Particle
Beam weaponry, but was defeated by the Soviet Union just
before achieving operational status. Thus America lost the
Battle of the Harvest Moon; and though this space battle is still
a secret, its consequences are cropping up all around us. In Topics #2 and #3, I will try to bring you
up to date on what has happened militarily and diplomatically
as the result of our losing the Battle of the Harvest Moon.
Right now, though, let me tell you the latest developments in
space itself. On Sept. 29, 1977, just two days after the Battle
of the Harvest Moon and the Gromyko ultimatum to Jimmy Carter,
the Soviet Union launched Salyut Space Station No. 6. This
was the same day that an Atlas Centaur Rocket became the second
American rocket in two weeks to explode during launch. The orbiting
of Salyut 6, my friends, signaled the beginning of the first
Soviet-manned mission to the moon; and the next day as the
Soviet moon-era was just dawning, the sun set on America’s moon
era. The NASA Space Center in Houston radioed remote control commands
to the moon to shut down all automated equipment still operating
there; and, as usual, the quiet and largely unnoticed news
reports about it told us this was being done to save money. On October 9, Soyuz 25 was launched with a
two-man crew to rendezvous with Salyut 6; and just as the
crew of Apollo Eleven carried an American flag with them to plant
on the moon, the crew of Soyuz 25 took a copy of the newly adopted
Soviet Constitution with them. As Mission Commander Kovalyonok
climbed aboard the space craft, he gave not the usual friendly
wave but a clenched fist salute for the benefit of the television
audience. Then Soyuz 25 lifted off from the same pad at the
Baikonur Cosmodrome that had been used twenty years ago to launch
Sputnik One. Less than two days later, Radio Moscow broke a
24-hour silence about the mission, which had caused many observers
to wonder if the cosmonauts might have suffered harm. It was
announced that the cosmonauts were in good condition and that
their Soyuz 25 capsule had landed safely. Supposedly, the mission
had been aborted because of the failure of Soyuz 25 to dock
successfully with Salyut 6; but actually, my friends, Soyuz
25 was successful in its rendezvous with Salyut 6. The purpose
was not to dock and remain in orbit but rather to link up to a
lunar propulsion and equipment module–and this Soyuz 25 did! By
the time Radio Moscow broke its silence with a cover story
about an aborted mission, Soyuz 25 was on its way to the moon. On October 16, after achieving lunar orbit,
the crew of Soyuz 25 detached a radio relay package and left
it in lunar orbit as they descended to the lunar surface. And just
as two Americans named Armstrong and Aldrin became the first
human beings to set foot on the near side of the moon, two Russians
named Kovalyonok and Ryumin have become the first to land on
the far side of the moon in Jules Verne Crater. The Soviet Union
is now working rapidly to do the same thing that the controlled
United States Government had tried to do–to set up a Particle
Beam weapons base on the moon from which to menace the
earth. The operation now under way in Jules Verne
Crater is strictly an interim step. The back side of the moon
is being used purely as a safe haven, and there all preliminary
preparations can be made without any chance, they hope, of observation
or retaliation by the United States. The plan is to assemble
everything that is needed for an initial Particle Beam installation,
including equipment, crews of cosmonauts, life-support
equipment, &c in a safe back-side location. Then, rockets will
be used to transport everything to the intended location on the
near side, rapidly and all at once. If all goes according to plan,
the Soviet Particle Beam Base will be able to become operational
very quickly after the fast move to the near side. In this way,
the Soviet Union expects to have its Particle Beam Moon Base
in operation and able to protect itself before any conceivable preemptive
strike could knock it out. They have no wish to suffer
the same fate they themselves inflicted a month ago on the secret
American moon base. Once it is operational with the charged Particle
Beam weapon to protect itself, the Soviet Moon Base will
be relatively secure in a military sense. This is especially true
since a small fleet of Cosmos Interceptors are now in earth orbit,
armed as they are with Particle Beam weapons. Therefore, once
the Soviet Moon Base is in operation on the near side of the moon,
the Soviet Union may well choose to make it known to the world–neglecting,
of course, to explain its true purpose. If so,
it will be a startling echo of the early days of the Soviet
Space Program when spectacular exploits in space were always
announced only after they were successfully under way, never beforehand. According to my latest intelligence on the
Soviet moon mission, the project is progressing very rapidly.
As of two days ago, October 27, the crew of Soyuz 25 have
already been joined at Jules Verne Crater by additional cosmonauts,
and the components for a Particle Beam weapon have also arrived.
At this rate, the space lift of crew and equipment to the near
side of the moon might come very soon; and if it does, the
timing would be perfect for Soviet propaganda purposes. The twentieth
anniversary of Sputnik One, which was October 4, was commemorated
by launching Soyuz 25 from the same launch pad as was used
for Sputnik One. Still ahead, on November 7, is the 60th anniversary
of the Bolshevik Revolution. How better to impress
the world with the vigor of the Soviet system than by having
the brand new Soviet Constitution praised over world-wide television
by a Cosmonaut broadcasting from the moon?! Topic #2–When I recorded Audioletter No.
26 last month on September 30, I alerted you to the fact that
Soviet submarines were on their way in great numbers to surround
the United States. A military confrontation was definitely underway,
and I warned you that the possibility of war itself could
not be ignored. Only the previous week-end the Soviet Union
had abruptly expelled all Western fishing trawlers from the Barents
Sea where the big Murmansk Naval Base is located. On Tuesday,
September 27 the secret Space Battle of the Harvest Moon ended
the existence of the American Moon Base in Copernicus Crater,
and by that day both the Barents Sea and also the Sea of Okhotsk
off the Kamchatka Peninsula were swarming with Soviet submarines.
While these military developments were going on behind
the scenes, Soviet Foreign Minister Andrei Gromyko delivered
a veiled ultimatum to the United States during a very harsh speech
at the United Nations; and that evening, at Gromyko’s demand,
a sudden and unexpected meeting was held at the White House
between Gromyko, Jimmy Carter, and Secretary of State Cyrus
Vance. Last month I told you what Gromyko told Carter
in very blunt language, and the very next day the two huge
Soviet submarine fleets left their staging areas to converge
on the United States. Since NATO regards the deployment to sea of
the Soviet submarine force as a major warning signal of impending
conflict, the situation was potentially very grave indeed.
So I warned you, based on information from my own intelligence
sources, that by October 7, if not before, the United States
would be surrounded along our East, West. and Gulf coasts by the
Soviet submarine fleet. On October 5, early this month, Vice Admiral
William Reed, Commander of our Atlantic Fleet Naval Surface
Forces, revealed at the Southeast Sea Power Symposium in Atlanta,
Ga., the fact that Soviet submarines together with many surface
ships were present in great numbers along our Atlantic and Gulf
coasts; and he said they were close enough to destroy American
cities in a nuclear war. He added that in any long war with the
Soviet Union, America would be at a grave disadvantage because
of the size and effectiveness of the Soviet Navy. The next
day, October 6, a naval spokesman in San Diego was reported
by a local radio station to have said that large numbers of
Soviet submarines had been sighted in the Pacific also heading in
our direction. On the morning of October 7, 1977, my own reports
indicated that the Pacific armada was about 700 miles west of
San Francisco at its closest point and was spread out over an area
of ocean 1000 miles long north to south and 200 miles deep. The
Atlantic armada was some 1600 miles from New York City at its
closest point spread out over a similar area of ocean. At that
point the Pacific armada was slowing down to enable the Atlantic
armada to close in to a similar distance. In the Gulf of Mexico,
meanwhile, the fleet of 29 submarines which were already
on station when I recorded Audioletter No. 26, were simply staying
there waiting. By the evening of October 9, the Pacific armada
was on station, in battle formation, spread out along our
entire west coast at a distance of 400 miles. The Atlantic armada
was just over 500 miles from New York City at its closest point
but still had the job of spreading out to parallel the east
coast line. While this was being done, the fleet west of our shores
began injecting a radiochemical poison into our air by means
of powerful fluorocarbon dispensers. This technique of
radiological warfare is exactly the same as I described one year
ago in Audioletter No. 17 in connection with the Soviet submarine
confrontation that occurred at that time–but this time the formulation
involves both plutonium, which is radioactive, and
zirconium. As I revealed in Audioletter No. 17, this combination
is what causes so-called Legionnaire’s Disease–and I’ll
have more to say about that in a moment. Early that day, October 9, British Foreign
Minister David Owen left London unexpectedly for a hurried two-day
trip to Moscow. The stated cover for the trip was to discuss
Rhodesia and trade matters, but Owen was actually going to Moscow
to capitulate. In spite of all the things Great Britain has
been trying to do to stand up to the Kremlin, the Soviet Particle
Beam breakthrough and America’s loss in this decisive race,
has made the situation untenable. The evening of the following day, Vice-President
Mondale was recalled to Washington out of a Columbus Day
parade in San Francisco–the crisis was deepening. By midday
October 12 the peak threat from the Soviet submarine fleet
was in progress. In the west the fleet had moved to within 250
miles from shore; in the east, the Soviets had moved to within
less than 150 miles of New York City; and along our Atlantic, Pacific,
and Gulf Coast lines, Soviet submarines were essentially
halted in position for attack at any moment. The western fleet continued
injecting radiochemical poisons into our air including
for a while strontium 90. There were fresh reports of
fireballs over Russia that day, and the same day it was announced
that Leonid Brezhnev will soon visit Britain due to the progress
made during Owen’s weekend visit. Secretary of Defense Harold
Brown, in Europe for talks with our NATO allies, now headed for
Yugoslavia, as had been announced. According to my own information,
a high United States Government official conveyed America’s
capitulation to the Soviet Union on October 14 through intermediary
channels. I have not been able to confirm the identity of this
official, but the fact that Brown was in Yugoslavia on that
day may not be coincidence. In any event, the Soviet threat of war served
its intended purposes well. It placed the United States
in a position in which any attempt to retaliate against the
Soviets for destroying our Moon Base would have been suicidal. In
particular, it insured that there would be no American attempt
to interfere with the Soviet moon mission, which took place
during this period. In this respect, it was the Cuban missile crisis
all over again but with the roles of America and Russia reversed. The Kremlin are well aware that the situation
now confronting the real rulers of America is totally new
to them and they really do not know what to do. For the first time
they no longer have an invisible ace up their sleeve to make Russia
toe the line, but the Soviet display of military power and readiness
to use it made the controlled Carter administration cave
in–just as Khrushchev had caved in under the same pressure 15 years
ago. The Russians are well known for their ability
to win games of chess, and they were not to be bluffed. As
a result, America surrendered to the Soviet Union on October
14, 1977, on terms I will reveal in Topic #3. And the Soviet acceptance
of that surrender was indicated on October 15 as the
bulk of the Soviet submarine fleets turned away from America’s
shores and began heading for home. By October 16, all but 2
of the submarines along our Gulf Coast were already heading
back into Cuban waters, where they were congregated along the north
coast east of Camaguey by October 18. The eastern and western
armadas were far out to sea by then except for 5 each that
stayed on station near our shores. On October 17, with the Soviet
Navy safely out of its threatening posture, NATO began its own
two-week naval exercises in the Atlantic; but the 12 Soviet
submarines which had stayed behind along our shores continued to
spew plutonium-zirconium poisons into our atmosphere
to produce Legionnaire’s Disease without any interference.
Legionnaire’s Disease, like so-called Swine Flu, is an artificial
disease caused by radiological warfare. My confidential
intelligence sources enabled me to warn that the Government’s
Swine Flu program was a hoax to cover up the effects
of radiological warfare in America as early as April 1976
in Audioletter No. 11, just after the program was announced by President
Gerald Ford; and in Audioletter No. 17, one year ago this
month, I was able to tell the full story of the Swine Flu hoax,
Legionnaire’s Disease, and additional strange illnesses that were
cropping up at that time. At this time last year the Soviet Union had
begun a program of experimental plutonium cloud attacks against
America’s population, using a formulation that was intended
to produce a Swine Flu-like illness, but that project was
never as effective as desired, and more recently they began experimenting
with a plutonium-zirconium formulation that produces
so-called Legionnaire’s Disease. This had been tested
first at the American Legion Convention in July 1976 where
180 people became ill and 28 died. Recent cloud attacks by Soviet
submarines have shown that this is a more effective poison
than the earlier one, as Legionnaire’s Disease has shown up increasingly
nationwide. As I explained in Audioletter No. 17, Legionnaire’s
Disease is basically a form of radiation sickness caused
deliberately at will by secret radiological warfare by the
Soviet Union. Recently it has been announced that a peculiar
pneumonia bacterium has been linked with Legionnaire’s
Disease, but this is only a complication. The basic cause which
weakens the body to permit this bacterial complication is the
Soviet radiochemical poison in our air. Not everyone falls ill
who is exposed to the poison in the low concentrations currently
found in our air. Those who are in good basic health, who get
sufficient rest and proper nutrition, have the best chance of
avoiding its effects. They are also the ones who are most likely
to survive if they do contract Legionnaire’s Disease. The mortality
rate is about 15%, the same now as it was in the first big outbreak
in Philadelphia. Antibiotics can affect the bacterial complication
but in no way affect the basic cause, which is radiological.
So far, the Center for Disease Control in Atlanta claims
that Legionnaire’s Disease has been reported by 22 states and
the District of Columbia. Some spokesmen are now referring
to it as “atypical pneumonia”; but call it what you will, it
is spreading. Many doctors still are not familiar with it, so
here is a list of the symptoms which accompany Legionnaire’s Disease:
Typically it begins with a general malaise and headaches;
within a day this is followed by a rapidly rising fever, which
may reach levels of from 102 to 105 degrees, together with chills.
A hacking cough, stomach ache, nausea and diarrhea are common,
sometimes including bleeding. Yet, as severe as it is, it is not
contagious–that is, passed from one person to another. Everyone
contracts it from the same source, namely the air we breathe.
Not everyone gets all the symptoms, different people seem
to be affected somewhat differently. In small children, I
am informed that it can show up as an especially severe form of
croup, due to the strong effect of the plutonium-zirconium poison
in the air passage of the throat. It may be that this
is the reason for the unusually severe outbreaks of croup now occurring
in some of our northern states, which State Health officials
are at a loss to explain. My friends, we in the United States together
with people in certain parts of Canada and Mexico, are the
victims of a spreading atomic plague. It’s produced by
undeclared warfare, radiological warfare, on the part of the Soviet
Union to demoralize and weaken our will to resist the
final takeover. Thanks to the surrender to the Kremlin by
the Carter administration this month–it’s not the Soviet
Union that will be laying down its arms, but we, OURSELVES! Topic #3–In a news conference on September
29, 1977, President Carter told reporters that there was no prospect
of any immediate agreement on a second Strategic Arms Limitation
Treaty, or SALT II. Two days earlier Soviet Foreign Minister
Gromyko had denounced the sorry state of Soviet-American
relations in very harsh terms and had demanded that a new SALT
accord be agreed upon “without any delay”; and in a hastily
called meeting that evening Gromyko made it clear that the Kremlin,
having put the secret American Moon Base out of operation
that day was now going to start cracking the whip; but Carter’s response
was more one of shock than one of immediate total capitulation,
and therefore the Soviet submarines began moving toward America
within hours after Gromyko left the White House. The surrender by the United States on October
14 involved America’s acceptance of Soviet demands for
a new SALT II agreement that will effectively disarm America
while leaving Soviet armaments free to expand and develop
still further. The only concession granted by Brezhnev to Carter
is a slight extension of time to allow the Carter administration
to prepare the way for America’s acceptance of the treaty
to strip us militarily. The extent of the radical shift
in favor of the Soviet Union concerning disarmament was revealed
on October 19 at the United Nations. There, in a committee
away from the limelight, but visible to key members of the
world’s diplomatic community, major statements were made by both
the United States and the Soviet Union. The American statement
expressed our willingness to cooperate and declared that
an agreement on a whole range of issues may be just around the
corner. The Soviet statement spoke of closing the arms race and
said Russia is ready to proceed with “drastic disarmament measures”;
and the American delegate, Mr. Fisher, expanded on the fact
that he now found a new sense of vigor and urgency, stressing
that the world is experiencing a fundamental shift in thinking
about disarmament. My friends, world-wide fundamental shifts
in thinking about anything do not happen without there being
a reason; and that reason, as I have told you, is the end of
the American Moon Base and the exclusive possession by the Soviet
Union of the new Particle Beam Super Weapon. The following
day details began leaking out about the shape of the proposed
SALT II accord, and it will continue to be the subject of heavy
news coverage and debate. SALT II contains tremendous concessions by
the United States with none of significance by the Soviet Union
even on its face. For example, Jimmy Carter canceled the B-1
Bomber, much to the Kremlin’s delight, with the silly argument
that the Cruise Missile would replace it. The Cruise Missile,
my friends, is more vulnerable to Soviet air defenses than
the B-1 would have been. But now, SALT II will even put the Cruise
Missile out of business by restricting its range sufficiently
to force our old slow B-52s to get so close to Russia in an
attack that they can be shot down by the vast Soviet Air Defense
system. In addition, the United States will agree not to provide
Cruise Missiles or the technology to build them to our NATO allies,
to whom the Cruise Missile could be very valuable. In
return for this, America is to settle for a Soviet pledge about
their supersonic Backfire Bomber, the rough equivalent of our
B-1 Bomber. According to NATO intelligence, the Soviet
Union is already flying more than 400 Backfires; in other words,
they already have a larger force of brand new supersonic strategic
Backfires than our force of 20-year old subsonic tired out
B-52s. And what’s more, the newest version has even greater
range than our B-52, and Soviet plants are churning out more Backfires
every month. But the Carter administration has settled
for a promise from the Soviets not to start producing Backfires any
faster than they are doing already. What’s more, the Kremlin has
simply given its word that Backfires will not be deployed in
a strategic manner despite their strategic capability. In return
for that, we agree not to count their Backfires at all as strategic
bombers, thereby exempting them from the limits of weaponry
spelled out in SALT II; and we agree to trust them, not requiring
verification of any kind. Can you imagine? But as serious as these matters are, they
are overshadowed by the seriousness of what is left out altogether
from the SALT II proposals! They say not a word about the radiological
warfare weapons which are being used right now on
the United States. They say nothing at all about anti-satellite
weapons despite their disastrous implications and despite
the fact that even the Defense Department admits they are now operational
in the Soviet arsenal. SALT II would do nothing to restrict
the use of microwave weapons on humans which, as I revealed
in Audioletter No. 20 for January 1977, is also being done
by the Soviet Union. And Beam weapons, particularly the Particle
Beam, which is the exclusive property of Russia now, are ignored
altogether. Thus for example, our strategic missile forces
are rapidly being neutralized while those of the Soviet Union
are preserved. Our early-warning satellites, which we depend
upon to warn us of any attack by the Soviet Union, are being destroyed
by Cosmos Interceptor satellites; and if we were to
launch our missiles, properly deployed Soviet Particle Beams could
be used to destroy the warheads in flight. The rough equivalents
in missiles that the Soviet Union now seems ready to write
into the SALT II accord, therefore means nothing. What is actually
being inaugurated now is the total disarmament of
America. Those who are using their influence to have America
accept the SALT II agreement, claim that by granting the Soviet
Union such horrendous concessions, we will take away
any Soviet incentive to go to war. But, my friends, this is the intellectual
way to say ‘Better Red than dead’–but if the ‘Alice
in Wonderland’ world of unreality that is built into SALT II is accepted,
then we as a nation will be both Red and dead. It has taken
200 years to undo the structure for freedom and prosperity that
was devised by our founding fathers. And more than once the United
States has been all but counted out by those who wanted to
destroy us, only to see America rise again, bounce back, and go
on. The Kremlin has no intention of taking that risk by ultimately
sparing us from war. They intend to destroy the American system
once and for all, and our disarmament beforehand is purely
for the purpose of making their destruction of our land easy
and without suffering on their own part. When ancient Carthage was
destroyed, the Romans plowed salt into the ground to ensure
that Carthage would never rise again. Now the Soviet Union is
using the SALT treaties to ensure that America, once defeated,
will never rise again. My friends, this is the legacy that America
is inheriting, thanks to the totally disastrous policies
which have been forced on America by the four Rockefeller brothers
for decades. I have been accused on occasion of carrying on a
personal vendetta against them, and sometimes against the whole
family whom I have never accused of being party to what the four
brothers are doing. But it is not personal, I do not make public
what I know about their personal lives; but I do believe that
their policies which affect millions of other lives, should be
made public. David, Nelson, Laurance, and John D. Rockefeller
III have never done anything to me personally but their policies
have brought the land I love, the United States of America,
to the brink of utter ruin. Knowing what I know, I have only two
possible choices–either speak out, or keep quiet;
and I cannot keep quiet. To understand why I say this, you have
to go through what I’ve gone through–you have to suffer, you
have to turn over and toss at night asking yourself “What’s happened
to this great country?” It’s always been my hope that the
four Rockefeller brothers would see the light and honestly
turn aside from policies which are destroying America. As
a great religious leader once told their grandfather, John D.
Rockefeller, Sr., “Great wealth is a trust and it should be
used for the public good.” As of now, none of the things that could be
done to save America are being done. It may be too late
to save America as we know it, but it is never too late to do what
is right and leave the success or failure of our efforts in the
hands of our Lord. Until next month, God willing, this is Dr.
Beter. Thank you, and may God bless and protect each and every
one of you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *