Is it Lawful States shutting borders? Class Action?

Is it Lawful States shutting borders? Class Action?


Criminals all stand. FAKE High Court of Australia is now in session God save the Corporate Queen’ please be seated Criminals. I’m gonna read out a couple of emails and then we’re gonna go to a break and I just want people to sort of let this rattle around in their heads over the course of the next couple of songs because no matter what you believe about the the coronavirus and no matter what you believe about the government’s response I mean some people think that they’ve done way too little and left it far too late other people think that they’re exercising way too much control over us and again you’ve got people sort of you know right being there in the middle so what we need people to do is set aside for a minute what they believe you know the right and wrong thing is to do what you know what they agree with or they don’t agree with and we need to get back to the essence and that is the law so I’m gonna leave you with these two emails that have come through from a couple of our members and we’re gonna read these out now and and when we come back we’re going to have a little bit of a conversation about the law in this regard and what our illustrious leaders do and don’t have the lawful authority to do so the first ones from Lawrence it says hi gang I thought we had a right to freedom of us freedom of assembly either in the Constitution or the 1689 Bill of Rights or Magna Carta also home confinement or lockup without a court order is surely questionable I’m sure if Stalin was alive today he would say why did I not think of this I missed the 25th February broadcast and the next one with rod Cullerton can I grab these two programs well yeah you can just join up as a podcast member and access those but in regards to the freedom of assembly and and whether or not home confinement is as lawful as I said we will address that after the break now the other the other email I don’t have a name it doesn’t seem to have come through it might have actually been off her Facebook post but it says regarding these corona quarantine laws or rule being imposed by the states and the federal government has the Governor General called a pandemic if so you would think he would need reasonable cause I a that the numbers or statistics stack up against the definition of a pandemic having occurred within the borders of this country locking up state borders I would think encroaches on section 92 restricting trade and commerce as it is incumbent on commerce among the states if you look at page 846 of the quicking Garant annotated Constitution it states we the people have the right to travel unburdened by state restrictions regulations and obstructions police or quarantine officers state authorities attempting to obstruct a man or woman or family traveling to the New South Wales Victoria and the man or woman attempts to cross over to Vic let’s say between albury-wodonga authorities would be effectively denying the right to travel under Section 92 how much of the quarantine laws in the Constitution mostly applied to passengers embarking from ships rather than men and women living on the land and traveling among the state borders we go back to section 92 of the annotated Constitution again where it says the right to traveled unburdened by state restrictions regulations and obstructions also the Constitutional Commission of 1988 identified that the federal government can only regulate business activities of entities to only some extent using the trade and commerce power under section 51 1 the Commission also quoted at page 33 of their issues booklet another major limit to the Commonwealth’s power in relate in regulating business and financial entities stems from section 92 of the Constitution this section has limited the Commonwealth’s ability to regulate interstate trade a definition of regulate to control or direct by rule principle method etc Macquarie dictionary 1981 page 14 56 the Morison government I think are leaving themselves open for a major constitutional challenge and for their torturous conduct and to compensate plaintiffs for unreasonable harm ie Australian businesses or anyone else wronged by this overreaction by taking controversial advice from who a foreign entity whose directions are based on highly questionable statistics to pronounce a pandemic that would stop cause damage to trade and commerce and individuals and the economy so we will respond to those emails including our thoughts on what people who have been affected by business closures loss of wages and the like can do so please don’t go anywhere we’ll be back with lots of exciting information after this short break now the question is do the powers that be do our illustrious leaders have the actual lawful authority to hold us in this prisoner island Oh didn’t want to think about that for a moment look whose wipe your nup and piped up from the other side of the table that’s it that’s your to Bob’s worth just know and you can prove it Wow here we go now we’re making some big calls well I’ve got some some facts that we should look at actually like a look at the boom so yeah that the facts are already established in law and if the listeners would like to go to a Victorian Act known as the charter of human rights and responsibilities Act of 2006 and if you have a look in that act that you will see that the Parliament has provided you minimum guarantees okay these are the minimum guarantees that you have and I’ll point the listeners to section 12 which is in regards to freedom of movement which states that every person lawfully within Victoria has the right to move freely within Victoria and to enter and leave Victoria right so when they say are we’ve shut down the borders I do believe they encroaching on your human rights also in the Australian Human Rights Commission act within the schedule schedule – specifically they provide the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights which Australia is a signatory absolutely and the state parties to the Covenant which is which one of those parties is Australia in accordance with the principles proclaimed in the charter of the United Nations recognition of the inalienable rights of all members of the human family in the foundation of freedom justice and peace of the world have agreed upon the following articles specifically article 12 which states that everyone lawfully within the territory of a state shall within that territory have the right to Liberty of movement hmm everyone shall be free to leave any country including his own country Wow what was sus Como saying no one leave the country no one leave the country and no one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his right to enter or leave his own country now Mike there’s also another treaty that Australia is a signatory to and I do believe you’re um your good friend mr. Scavo it has my good location under Article 26 which says that every treaty in force is binding upon the parties to it and must be performed by them in good faith and then it goes on to provide article 27 and this is the clincher right okay here we go a party may not invoke the provisions of its internal law as a justification for its failure to perform a treaty Wow ie they can’t rely on some internal law here in Australia that contravenes international law and international human rights correct Wow so those pretty clearly immerse signatories they are bound by the treaties and the Vienna treaty binds them to it and there is no way to get out of it so you know unless they I could maybe assume if they brought in martial law that could have some sort of effect but currently there is no martial law apparently the Constitution is in full force from time to time allegedly as the Attorney General of the Commonwealth Office has told us so the the treaties do apply currently at the moment so you do have the right to move interstate and intrastate within the state mmm so you recommend people perhaps print a copy of that off and keep it with their vehicles okay so and just to move around and one other point to make is if they go to the Human Rights Act I would us is the Victorian one I would suggest that they look at section 31 of the Act mana is at 38 perhaps let me just bring it up here yes it’s section 38 and it says subject to this sub this section it is unlawful for a public authority to act in a way that is incompatible with a human right or in making a decision to fail to give proper consideration to a relevant human right mmm so folks if you use these minimum guarantees that the parliament provides you know you shouldn’t have any trouble crossing state borders or perhaps traveling to magpie house there you go from the other side of the city I’d like to say g’day to Matt who regularly does that say there’s lots of people out there worried just about crossing the city and yeah there’s certain things that are in place that not the authorities from imposing on your rights of movement and your liberties to act freely within the state absolutely and again look we want to point out that you know we do still want people to act socially responsibly I mean you know what we saw at Bondi Beach the other days is just crazy it’s unnecessary and and it’s just not socially responsible people put posts up on our Facebook all the time oh well you know it’s one thing though knowing about your rights but you know what about your responsibilities and absolutely people you know we need people to take responsibility for themselves we need people to take responsibility for others we need people to look out for others but yeah if you and your family want to get in the car and you know cross a you know across the city or across the state line or whatever you are absolutely well within your rights to do that and no one has any lawful authority to stop you so just keep that in mind we know a lot of people are missing you know contact with you know with family that might be you know interstate or you know some distance apart with interstate and these sections and subsections that we just covered are there to assist you and provide you with a bit of certainty and security and respect of that like one thing I could recommend if people are traveling over the border is if they are stopped to to tell the the officer in question that they are performing commerce and they’re going to work perhaps because section 92 provides that all commerce shall be absolutely free there can be no restrictions to commerce over the state borders absolutely no Brent Brent do you want to add in another word or three there or are you just happy to just sit back idly by what what’s the show actually supposed to be part of it you know that’s how it works otherwise I’ll just change it to Mike and Darren show you know yeah yeah well in in fact there is a I’d like to put a couple of words in you okay oh yeah yes of course a subject of the Queen hmm where is it in any legislation or any of these orders brought out by the Commonwealth or any of the so called States is there a restriction of movement on a subject of the coin of course I don’t think there is it’s been awkward and it’s something that we need to be aware of if we are pulled over yes officer how are you is any of your actions today against a subject of the coin and if so please satisfy that presumption yeah absolutely well national or a Commonwealth national yes because we are most certainly not an Australian citizen oh definitely not we definitely don’t have been that person no it’s certainly not a person not at all now it seems as though they’re attempting to do some other interesting things so one of our members from Queensland has sent us through an article and this was in relation to the new laws that they brought in there during the week I think it was a couple days ago Thursday Friday or something like that and yeah this is basically to bring it in line with the the laws that are here in Victoria anyway but this article says something very interesting it says that all these new new laws ba-ba-ba also changes the state constitution to allow the executive council to meet by teleconferencing or video conferencing to allow continuity of government if ministers get sick or are quarantined now what you’d like to say a few words about that well that would be in Contra distinction to section 106 of the Commonwealth Constitution which provides that only the States Constitution can be amended by the States Constitution and not a subordinate instrument that is under the States Constitution itself hmm so there’s lots of misbehaving happening meaning ministers I’ve heard I’ve heard in the news as well there are certain ministers that are very worried about the bypassing of the process to enact laws there’s many laws that are being enacted now without any votes or any readings in Parliament so yeah now they are or should I say the the Commonwealth is allowed to write laws in states of emergency but where have these states of emergency being declared I think there’s one or two states but not in the Commonwealth is yet and so yeah there might be a lot of a lot of civil cases coming up in the future if people are aware of their rights and and what the restrictions or the restrictions that the government can bring upon you in relation to your right of movement and the liberties that you have and the rights you have under the treaties that the government have provided to you as minimum guarantees yeah so on that point you know if if the these lovely illustrious leaders and powers-that-be have made these orders declarations decrees whatever it is that you want to you know call it and they’ve caused businesses to shut down and they’ve caused those businesses obviously to lose significant amounts of money and they’ve in cause the employees of those businesses to also lose a significant amount of money and and suffer under hardship what what possible recourse is for is there for those for those businesses and those employees against the various state governments we’ve done that well I do believe that the governments are imposing these policies upon local businesses and I do believe that local businesses would be able to start invoicing this company posing as government for the restrictions that they are imposing upon their business I myself will be issuing some invoices to the state of Victoria to the Parliament there’s certain restrictions that they have provided that are not not within the spirit of the law let’s say yes yeah absolutely and in fact this brings in the competition consumer act and this is the cartel provisions they are providing a restrictive trade practice yep and as such businesses now need to start invoicing this incorporated body claiming to be government and which is clearly cartel yep and as such enforce these bills upon these corporations for losses yeah yep yeah it definitely looks like they could be a class action on their hands hmm

47 Comments on "Is it Lawful States shutting borders? Class Action?"


  1. This is how he must sound during the satanic rituals ! They look like they are missing their cloaks and hoods!!! Creepy Fucks!!! 🤢😡🤪

    Reply

  2. COND 19 is a financial reset, mandatory vaccines (with a chip) and cashless society to follow all controlled by the 5G social crediting system. Time to wake up people.

    Reply

  3. nup. no authority. another repugnant case of domestic violence on the people as per definition by the illegal corporation pretending to be government.

    Reply

  4. 🎉👍😎♥️
    It's a Contract Virus…
    Don't Contract with them or
    You will lose your Rights

    Reply

  5. YES THAT'S RIGHT FOREIGN ARMY OPERATING ON AUSTRALIAN SHORES
    AND I INVITE EVERY AUSTRALIAN TO GIVE THEM THE FUCKING FINGER
    FREEMAN QUOTE
    WE LOVE YOU JOEY

    Reply

  6. Why is that everyone around me can not see what is going on?? I feel like an idiot. .truly…

    Reply

  7. No they don’t have a right to do any of this … asking us to do it is one thing but telling and forcing is totally another

    Reply

  8. A factory making signs, quarantine area, 65’000 fine for trespass , they are really busy

    Reply

  9. Following the American Revolution and up until August 14, 1935, Supreme Court Justices refer to the American People as sovereigns and nontaxpayers. Strictly legally speaking, as creators of the United States of America, they enjoy life under common law, free of the personal legislative jurisdiction of Congress and grasp of executive power— facts which distinguish the new nation from all others.
    As absurd as it may sound, the sole legal justification used by both Federal and State authorities today, to subject the American People to income tax and statutory law, is presumption of residence in the District of Columbia. The writings referenced below reveal precisely how this is so, who is behind the fraud, and how any American born in one of the Union states can recover his original standing as regarded by the Supreme Court and noted above, in but a few days’ time.
    There is another situation, as well:
    Those entrusted with the security of the unalienable Rights with which all men are endowed by their Creator, among which are “Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness,” i.e., Congress, no longer work in behalf of the American People but—as documented in the said writings, as of no later than the mid-19th century—are active agents of foreign principals and personally culpable for the criminal fraud and High Treason necessary to produce the aforesaid change in 1935 and maintain it thereafter.
    The consumption of the vitality of every single other society over the last many thousands of years, thrust into the role of host for the selfsame line of parasites that now infest the American body politic, courtesy of “leaders” such as those ensconced on Capitol Hill, lies in mute testimony to the gravity of the situation.
    So, the issue is both personal and national: the security of the unalienable Rights guaranteed the American People July 4, 1776, and the fate of the American Republic.
    The writings offered herein do not operate as a collective soap box on which this author stands and expounds on theories; rather, they are repositories of fact and law—and are tendered for the benefit of anyone who would like to understand exactly what is going on and how to access the remedy authorized by law for the instant personal and national situations.
    Numerous legal professionals have reviewed Purging America of the Matrix (Link 3), the first of the five works to be published, and it has yet to receive a negative remark. Here is a comment from one of them:
    Years from today, when they look back to determine exactly when things began to improve, they will point to this document. M.R., attorney.
    1

    The sole mechanism used by the Government of the United States to control the American People is the Social Security contract (a government franchise); the “driving privilege” is a derivative thereof. The former allows for a presumption of residence in the District of Columbia, geographical territory over which the Constitution authorizes Congress to exercise exclusive legislation; the latter is predicated solely on the former and allows for a presumption of personal jurisdiction. Both schemes are inherently fraudulent and this material provides documentary evidence of that fact.
    Extinguishment of the Social Security contract and franchise and “driving privilege” restores a Union-state-born American to life under common law, established as of July 4, 1776, realized the day of his/her birth, and dissolves all subjection to state/State/Federal statutes, which obtain only against residents of the District of Columbia or one of the territories, and eliminates all entanglement with all so-called alphabet-soup agencies, each of which is an instrumentality of the municipal corporation by the name of the District of Columbia, incorporated for political purposes February 21, 1871, and doing business as United States® (source: “United States® Census 2010”). The District of Columbia Municipal Corporation Social Security Political Movement constitutes the basis of power of the District of Columbia municipal corporation.
    On June 30, 1864, Congress pervert the meaning of the word “state” to mean the same thing as its constitutional and statutory opposite, i.e., the District of Columbia or one of the territories; and do the same thing shortly thereafter with “State.” Since that time the terms of art “state” and “State” equate, ultimately, to the District of Columbia. The legal meaning of the term ”United States” no longer includes the several commonwealths united by and under the Constitution for the United States of America of March 4, 1789, of which presently there are 50. The government of each Union-state is a political subdivision of the District of Columbia (by way of Social Security).
    The exclusive authority for the issuance, suspension, or revocation of a driver’s license is the District of Columbia, through one of its 50 political subdivisions (the so-called 50 States) and DMV thereof. The within material provides documentary evidence of the foregoing and reveals exactly what to do to liberate oneself from the Social Security and driving-privilege schemes, as authorized by law.
    It is significant to note that no United States District Judge or United States Attorney has ever failed to dismiss, summarily, any Federal case in which this writer has assisted, upon the filing into the record of the case of a single document (with attachments), prepared by this writer and signed and sworn to by the defendant, for lack of jurisdiction. This material is offered free of charge to anyone who wants to understand what is going on and how to recover all unalienable Rights, among which is Liberty, as guaranteed by the supreme organic instrument of creation of the United States of America, to which all descendant instruments must hew in letter and spirit for their validity, namely The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America of July 4, 1776.
    With kind regards,
    Thomas Clark Nelson

    Reply

  10. Lynnette Zang has warned that the bankers are already working on the next system of financial enslavement

    https://steemit.com/money/@sgtreport/breaking-bankers-new-sdr-crypto-blockchain-will-enslave-humanity-lynette-zang

    Reply

  11. KYR Group : Guys , I love your work overall on most stuff and have followed and attended your events over the years …. but don't say you're for individual freedom and then condem the free thinking public whom of their OWN FREE WILL went to bondi beach for the day !!

    No one forced them or coerced them to do so …. they engaged in a peaceful , CONSENTUAL action !!

    Regardless of what you or anyone else thinks , they hurt no one !!

    I find it hard to believe that for such well researched guys , none of you have researched any of this Gov. Virus Propaganda Narrative thrust upon us !!

    The numbers don't stack up and are factually minuscule ( if even true ) compared to Influenza deaths every year !!

    Regardless of any Gov. rhetoric , " I would much rather have Dangerous Freedom over Peaceful Slavery "

    * Thomas Jefferson

    Reply

  12. This corona crap is WAY overblown and hyperventilated, I just got off the phone with an internationally renowned doctor who recently attended a medical conference in Russia where he says there is no “panic” and no “pandemic” and little concern over corona.

    The consensus of the doctors attending the conference I’ve been told by this medical professional is that this virus is a “low grade flu” that particularly affects Chinese due to their low holds of Vitamin C and their inveterate habit of heavy smoking.
    The consensus is also that healthy Americans and Europeans who catch this low grade flu can be healed in three days by undergoing normal applications for flu symptoms and not even have to wait a week as it usually takes for influenza issues.
    We need to ask ourselves and each other who exactly is “testing positive” for corona, what the “test” exactly is, and what exactly is being “tested.”
    My hunch is that it tests for antibodies of influenza that are not life threatening.
    And why are there no autopsy or coroner reports on these “deaths?”
    And what are the sanitary conditions of these nursing homes that are known to have low-paid workers who do not practice hand washing or normal hygiene procedures?
    Now we’re hearing in NY that an Orthodox Jewish Nursing Home has patients who are affected by “corona.”
    Orthodox Jews are KNOWN for wretched hygiene practices, many of them don’t take baths or showers for days, they stink, and the low-paid workers in these nursing homes do NOT wash their hands or practice ordinary sanitary procedures.
    That said, I’m convinced, along with Dr Ron Paul, that this corona crap is a total HOAX to deprive us of our God-given liberties.
    Now New Orleans and a Jew mayor in Champagne Illinois have just introduced bans on selling, trading, and transporting guns. We all MUST resist the zionist takeover of our veins, bellies, and defense against joo tyranny.

    SEE: http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=1431#comment-2990172

    +Brother Nathanael

     http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=1431

    Reply

  13. The Coronavirus Hoax

    http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2020/march/16/the-coronavirus-hoax/

    Reply

  14. Thanks for an interesting video. a curiosity that has bugged me for a while is at Bunnings, when one legitimately purchases items and have their receipt, at the main entry/exit door are people whom effectively attempt and do stop and detain people to prove their purchase, only some people are targeted, not every single lawful customer, ive not seen any other business do this what are your thoughts on this?

    Reply

  15. The entire corrupt government should be arrested and locked.
    We, the people need to take over and take our country and our freedom back !!!

    Reply

  16. They have no rights they have control They created a reason to shut down the world The question is why and whom

    Reply

  17. This is great info, but while we are tied up taking this to task they are only distracting us from 5G weaponised roll out that kills. Not an exaggeration. Please check MAX STEEL AND BARRY TROWER.

    Reply

  18. They’ve passed the state of emergency laws here in U.K. but not declared it’s a state of emergency so how can they stand 🤷‍♂️

    Reply

  19. I would suggest that we've been under undisclosed martial law bankrupted and in liquidation since we went off the gold standard. The Lieber Code now applies to us as non-belligerents under occupation of a foreign entity. (we are living in a captured nation)

    Reply

  20. Besides CV outbreak…Just maybe, leaders of many countries are working together to round up the Deepstate. Global shutdown. Borders closed. People WW told to stay home, people are off the streets, no false flags, we are safe while Military collect the Cabal.

    Reply

  21. Great Stuff Liabilitymate, I have been telling all the young workers to use this to extinguish their hex debt. Unfortunately they have closed down many businesses today on Sydney's Nth Beaches, so this will make it more difficult. Convincing these poor young fools that they should never have been lumberd with this debt is surprisingly easy takes about three sentences
    ☮🙏❤🤗👉🗝

    Reply

  22. The picture on the wall at the beginning is so appropriate, money, corruption, disfunctional. The fraud of this Judiciary in Australia is appalling and everyone knows it..

    Reply

  23. Yes, the Elite Cabal are clearly using this "pandemic" as a TEST to see how compliant the masses are! BUT are we missing their point, that they are doing this in the interests of the People???

    Reply

  24. How many people, especially after losing their jobs, are going to take the chance of $1 000 on the spot fines?

    Reply

  25. It's all for control a full political correction for everyone! They don't care about 100 trillion dollars.
    Money is created out of air everytime someone asks for credit!
    The virus is fear pawn!
    Nothing adds up! Everyone's figures are all over the place!
    Earth can not sustain this relentless economy, they it fuked up!
    It's a western economic world overhaul, and we are going to notice a far few people missing by the time this is over!

    Reply

  26. Where do I get a real copy of the constitution you are referring to, there's so many books online , which one is correct , and where do I get a copy of pages 676 and 791 that you want us all to read … thanks

    Reply

  27. This was a desperate hand. Secret societies at work here. Testing how far they can push all these moving parts stretching their arms as far as we will tolerate it.

    Reply

  28. Deprivation of Liberty is trespass a tort in law based on Fiction while they roll out 5G in schools and shopping centres.
    Pandemic, meaning Pan meaning 'All;' and Demic meaning Demos meaning 'People'.
    Corona Virus kills 56 people per day world wide alegedly and the common flu of which Corona Virus is considered when the words flu is mentioned kills 1200 people per day world wide. There fore Corona Virus is not a Pan Demic.

    Epidemic epi meaning 'High' or 'Upon' and demic meaning Demos meaning 'People' means upon the people. Has no real meaning as to stem root or suffix oyjer than people and Bablily speaking means wide spread disease.
    Nope i haven't met one person affected by bird flu… and we need to on mass tell the police to fuck right off ans ask them to identify them selves and where they live and are they one of us or are they one of them.. a Privately owned commercial offshore entity based on Harm.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *