White Nationalists HATE the WEST

White Nationalists HATE the WEST


[instrumental intro music] Have you ever been accused of hating the West? I sure know I have. But the people who often claim that I hate the West are often those of an identitarian movement. I’m talking white nationalists. But the irony of this entire claim is that from what I can tell, white nationalists hate the West. They view the West as a superior culture that needs to be saved and so on. But let’s analyze a few pillars of this culture. We’ll talk science, art, and politics. In terms of science, white nationalists will take whatever suits them and their current narrative, whether the science be cutting-edge, outdated, or pseudoscience. Take for instance: [drum roll] Race and IQ. “You know, there are differences in intelligence between individuals, so why not between groups as well, y’know?” “That’s right.” “It’s quite consistent from a logical perspective.” “Yes, that’s right, that’s right.” When it comes to discussing race, the white nationalist qualifies intelligence and correlates it with race. This requires two leaps of logic: 1. The outdated IQ test is still at all relevant to how modern intelligence is qualified and measured. 2. That these have inherent things to do at all with race and not poverty or systemic conditions often caused by racism. Sex and gender politics are often another example of the white nationalist worldview in which the science tends to be outdated. White nationalists view sex is inherently dimorphic and is seen as the same as gender. Any the information that deviates from this, even if it’s updated science, is just Jewish degeneracy, or cultural Marxism, or globalists, or, accusing these cultural Marxists, or in more recent times, postmodernists – as if postmodernism has anything to do with this somehow, of having an agenda to put into universities. All of these also mean the same thing: They’re all targeted at meaning the Jews. But let’s talk about art. When white nationalists talk art, they inherently mean “art that fits my worldview”. To them, art has changed, and it’s caused by the aforementioned cultural Marxism. Arts changing from classic beauty is caused from the same roots of free thinking and western values, and the idea of provoking thought, which is kinda the point of modern art. Their understanding of beauty and art is only surface deep. Their appreciation is only in the immortalization of figures, and not the actual Western values around art. For more on modern art, check out these videos. The discussion of meaning and provoking thought is a nice segue into discussing their value of political thought. White nationalists, most damning to their credit of all, absolutely hate Western politics, despite their mirage being centered all around it. Especially democracy, a big part of the enlightenment was that society should evolve, and democracy is a key part in evolving a society to be fair to those who live in it or in changing at all. White nationalists want an ever-preserved bubble of a society – stale and stagnate. White nationalists absolutely hate the West. Thanks for watching! Please check out my Patreon below and donate if you can, and thanks to my many patrons who are listed here.

74 Comments on "White Nationalists HATE the WEST"


  1. Its like what hbomberguy said, and i agree. White nationalists views of the west are like "freedom and democracy as long as you agree with me"

    Reply

  2. They hate Christianity, they hate the liberal tradition, they follow ideologies that the West defeated.

    They hate the religion that helped build the West, but they'd love to keep the patriarchal laws.

    They like to hide behind 'free speech' and 'skepticism', but they follow pseudoscience and call everything they disagree with 'propaganda' that needs yo be shut down.

    They follow anti-Semetic white nationalism with absolute hate for any foreigners, but will throw around the name Voltaire and Adam Smith and other Western thinkers who promoted globalization.

    Reply

  3. They want to preserve an imaginary ideal of the west, one that which doesn't exist and contradicts reality. Much like how the Nazis wanted to culturally cleanse Europe to preserve the 'superior race' based on a mythical pseudo-history society.

    Reply

  4. Good video, why? Because its short. I often fell in any discussion  people will stop lessoning to you if you take longer to explain your side then they did.

    Reply

  5. But Cultural Marxism is a thing, it's the modern leftist style of thinking when it comes to culture, to follow the philosophy of the critical theory to an extreme in which leftists today want to change everything that is normal or traditional without any reasonable explanation.

    Just look at the "gender argument", it's a simple scientific fact that people are either XX or XY, the people who aren't like this are an extreme minority which also suffer many observable physical and mental disabilities that come with it, a clear example.

    Reply

  6. when people on the right atack postmodernism they are really attacking cultural marxism but they know that that is a rediculous right wing conspiracy theory that will make them look like a joke

    Reply

  7. Nice and succinct.
    "…quite consistent from a logical perspective". If by logic, she means individuals are fully equivalent to collectives. Barring this peculiar "logic", one is bound to see it as just a shitty analogy.
    Ahh, modern art. I could see PJW's spiteful little face belching vitriol at the camera in my mind when confronted with Entartete Kunst. I'm not calling PJW a Nazi for sharing their official stance on visual art… but even Nazi supporter Emil Nolde was less stagnant in his artistic opinions.

    Reply

  8. Your delivery gets better and better. A few more examples would not have gone amiss, but hey- all the more reason for a follow-up video. Excellent stuff!

    Reply

  9. you explore some really interesting ideas in this video but i think it should have been longer to further expore them, otherwise nice work comrade

    Reply

  10. Studies have covered other factors that may affect IQ and there are still a huge gap. It there are obvious difference (in general) in things like athletic ability, why are you having troubles imagining an IQ differences. IQ test are not outdated, they are accurate. Thumbs down for lies and lack of research and evidence.

    Reply

  11. Maybe I am stupid but I don't see a connection between a title and a footage/narration of the video. If you want to seriously analyze WN's "westernism" you have to first define (or look how WN's define) "the West" and its constituents. Surely the West must mean something more then "it appeared in Europe therefore it is western". If so, what is it? Is communism western? Is mass-scale democracy western? Is belief in progress western? Is anthropocentrism western? Only then you could answer the question "does WN hate the west?" (My answer is no, they love it and they are right. Western civilization is an unfortunate event.).

    Reply

  12. Yes the far right's idea of loving "the west" seems to be larping as crusaders. I think a more fascinating contradiction are the neo-con/Islamophobic polemicists who claim to love liberalism but advocate discrimination against Muslims.

    Reply

  13. Can you post your sources on the question of IQ, race and poverty, as well as the gender/sex question?

    Reply

  14. Most of the talk about "western values" and such is simply right wing PC code white supremacy. White nationalists don't give a shit about the west.

    Reply

  15. have you ever noticed that white nationalists seemingly hate other whites? if they got what they wanted they'd be scrutinizing each other and kill each other until there is one "genetically superior" white person left. if white genocide were real then the white nationalists would probably be the biggest advocates of it

    Reply

  16. I'm with the white nationalists on this one. western values are not nationalist. They are different

    The enlightenment had it's faults, this video protects the multicult

    Reply

  17. Also they have fully embraced this "hierarchy" around cultures as if cultures can even be compared like that when it can't. There are no inferior or superior cultures. There is no inferior of superior art, music, dance….

    Reply

  18. I love the west, it gave us ice cream, rap music and marxism. It's got a lot going for it!

    Reply

  19. It's like finding a fossil, but instead of wondering what caused it to be this way and what it helped shape, it's just "Hey, a fossil! Cool!"

    This isn't bad thinking for, say, a budding scientist who is not in their teens yet. They haven't developed their thinking strategies and ability to connect the dots, and they aren't aware of all the wonderful scientific explanations that make every step possible.

    Eventually, though, they need to develop that so that not only they understand what we know now, but also what we will know and come to experience in the future. A scientist, in order to explain their findings and analysis, needs to understand this so that they are not only as accurate but also as groundbreaking as can be.

    This is the same problem with white nationalism. They take snapshots of certain historical time frames and events, and they say "Hey, I like this. Why don't we return to this?" This ignores all the events leading to that time as well as our current knowledge of all that has come from it. In short, there's no context or framework, and all that remains is that snapshot.

    White nationalism: simply snapshots in a vacuum

    Reply

  20. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eMEh_2Edt9A
    Hey can you dismantle this idiots video?
    He really seems like he has no fucking brain..

    Reply

  21. So true. Let's compare 2 islands–Japan and Haiti. The ONLY reason why Japan is a leader in robotics and electronics, while Haiti still struggles to feed itself, is because Japan did NOT have the misfortune of having been enslaved by the White Man! It has absolutely NOTHING to do with this so-called IQ thing. There is NO doubt whatsoever that if White America were forced to pay Haitians its slave reparations that are rightly owed to them, within a generation or 2, Haiti and its people would soon catch up to Japan as the world leader in robotics and technology. It's NOT about IQ, it's about correcting historical injustices, and the ONLY way to correct them now, since so much muddied water under the bridge has flown, is by forcing White America to pay its duty to the past, to pay long-overdue slave reparations to blacks of African descent throughout the world.

    Reply

  22. Wow, I subscribed to you a few months ago and it's great to see your channel more active lately. Your videos are high quality and I anticipate that you will quickly rise as a positive, influential voice in this corner of YouTube. I'm excited to see your work continue.

    Reply

  23. Watch me Straw Man for 3 minutes. So many mistakes I can point out in this video and I'm not even white. Sad.

    Reply

  24. White nationalists understand Western culture as deeply as Taco Bell understand Mexican food.

    Reply

  25. Good video, and I've been saying this all the time. The only reason why white nationalists hate ISIS (a genuinely contemptible group also for similar and different reasons) is because they are jealous of them.

    Reply

  26. Did you really just call the IQ Test irrelevant and outdated? While IQ Tests are not perfect, IQ is a strong predictor of criminality, how far you will get in education, etc.

    Reply

  27. 2:54 Aren't you an Anarchist? And you are calling others out for supposedly hating Western politics? Lmao. If we went back and asked those Enlightenment thinkers who thought of those ideas, they would agree with us on race. They would be disgusted to see the West having become so weak and self hating that it is openly inviting the destruction of its creators, the Whites.

    Reply

  28. You seem like someone who hasn't been listening when it comes to race and IQ, or someone who hates his own target audience enough to lie to them, repeatedly:
    We've controlled for income, and race differences still impacts IQ, We've controlled for education level, and race still impacts IQ, we've controlled for both of these together, and race still impacts IQ, we've not made any "leaps in logic", we aren't using logic, that's for doing math and philosophy, we are doing biological science, science is purely induction-based discovery, it uses logic only to make predictions and formulate tests, so you seem to not know what science IS, and yet you claim authority on what is "outdated" science, which, if you believe in the idea, would mean that you would disregard classical mechanics, as soon as you learn about relativity, or on what is pseudo-scientific, something that becomes very ironic since you advocate for pseudo-science later on.
    You don't mention that our earliest intelligence studies, as recorded by "the bell curve", took into consideration economic and educational influences on intelligence, and even quantified it – at about 20%, and only applicable in the formative years of life, WAY before a kid even gets to learn about the concept of racism or race (you'd really have a hard time grappling with that one), all the studies we produce to argue our case are much worse than even all this: they are highly reproducible, they have been done over and over, and keep coming back with the same patterns, when controlling for money and schooling, the same pattern.
    Why would you claim, then, that we haven't considered education and wealth, when we have eliminated those explanations in our earliest work? you either don't know the science, or you are intentionally lying to your audience.
    This leads me to believe that you are a fucking moron, who talks with confidence about things he knows nothing about, a textbook example of the theories of the dunning-krueger effect.
    As for "institutional discrimination", why are African Americans ABOVE Africans in IQ? there are African nations that were never colonized, and the IQ is still around 70, just like the rest of the continent, yet in the united states, where white people have all the power, blacks do TEN POINTS better with an IQ of 80! completely different results from what your hypothesis would predict – that they would have to do worse, since they are surrounded by more "discrimination".
    You also are countering something with nothing, leaving us to make all the observations and conduct experimentation, wich is the #1 HALLMARK OF A PSEUDOSCIENTIST! You have yet to show an example of discrimination, as well as a means by which it would reduce their cognitive abilities, and sow how it affects IQ, there was an attempt with "stereotype threat", which was presented by one study, but other studies which attempted to reproduce the results failed, meaning that it was either dishonest, flawed, or statistically non-representative, meaning, a junk study.
    And, on top of all that retardation, you presented the pseudo-science of "multiple intelligences", a concept that is rejected by the intelligence research community, and by the larger psychological community outside of a few politically-motivated think tanks, you know, the type of "researchers" who are still arguing that tobacco products aren't addictive, or that biblical creationism is supported by the sciences, the "multiple intelligences" are essentially another set of "multiple types of evolution", each "intelligence" other than "g", or "general cognitive ability", are elements of personality, with no ties to economic or social successes, like the different forms of "evolution", they fall under another field entirely, and in that field, we already have names for them: the big five, you either don't know what the "big five" personality traits are, or you do and are being intentionally dishonest to your audience, the multiple types of "intelligence" also resemble the multiple forms of "evolution", in that they are meant to obscure the science behind what the professionals mean by "intelligence" – general cognitive ability, pretty much due to the science there not really having anything in support of the opposite side of the debate.
    Going internationally;
    If Africa is less intelligent because of poverty, then why is Africa so rich in resources, compared to most of Europe, and if it's the natural resources that cause poverty, the so-called "resource curse", then why is Norway, a place with similar, if not better, levels of natural resources, not like Africa? because the rest of Europe helped them out? for most of Norway's history, they were at war with their neighbors, only after the industrial revolution did lasting cooperation between European countries become a thing.
    Why is it that the largest economic market from African countries throughout history was slaves, when they had fertile lands, every building material you could hope for, and vast amounts of livestock?
    And why did they never invent the things Europe, Asia, Hawaii, and even South America did, even centuries after everyone else invented them, you'd think they would at least come up it with on their own eventually, why was there never an african navy? african farmlands? african writing? apart from ehtiopia, they never even made a wheel, why did the africans not make a wheel? did they have no need for one? it gets worse, as mentioned before, they were the continent with the objectively best terrain for human civilization, yet their central economic export, and internal trade, was SLAVERY, what kind of idiot has ample access to food, minerals, trees, salt (ESPECIALLY salt), large freshwater lakes, etc. and yet makes SELLING HUMANS their main source of income?
    We've got evidence that then Egyptians were white, they had an environment that was just like the rest of Africa, and yet they built one of the greatest empires the world ad ever known, when the Arabs invaded and set up the caliphate, they were able to work African land to much the same effect, they both kept slaves, but slavery was never the central resource of their economy.
    Both the Egyptians and the Arabs had the same setup starting out, and the Arabs had less knowledge of the area, and yet they easily created great empires with the treasure trove of what was there.
    Guess what? Arabs are around 90 IQ, and they happened to make Africa work for them, figure that shit out.

    Reply

  29. IQ is not outdated. It is a very good predictor of how well an individual will achieve in various different areas across his life. No other intelligence test is as predictive as IQ. Denying it's validity by saying things like "well what really IS intelligence?" is dishonest.

    We know that IQ is 50%-80% heritable, and that the rest is down to environmental factors like malnutrition, and education to a lesser extent. Nutrition levels and level of education is not worse for blacks by any significant leap of the imagination, and certainly not enough to justify an 15 point difference. There have also been various studies done on black children adopted by white parents in well off neighbourhoods. The scores don't differ much, showing that the environmental factors to IQ have been dealt with in our society, and the difference that we see is down to genetics.

    Also, if this had anything to do with racism, why do Asians outperform Whites at every turn?

    Reply

  30. The funniest thing that popular media was formed much more by capitalism than actual Marxism. The closest you get to a Marxist art is when a media somewhat critical of capitalism gets past the radar of studio owners, which is much less nowadays than it used to be. I call the recent toning down of anti-capitalistic messages in media as the Robocop reboot effect, as that part of the original got completely removed from the new one (and the only satire we got was some pisstake on Fox news).

    Reply

  31. Ok… Show me proof of Systemic racism in todays culture… Show me proof through science that 57 genders exist….. Proof please? Not feelings…..

    Reply

  32. Black people created the american slave trade, the slaves were sold to the americans by black slavers, who also sold then to south america as well, and the legal precedent that allowed the shitshow that was the american slave trade was a west african immigrant who wanted to keep his slave, if there is one black man that needed to be lynched, ut was him, because he fucked things up for all of us.

    After emancipation, the united states bought a large share of land in africa, abd named it liberia, they paid the slaves all the reparations they needed to when they gave then their own country, liberia was exactly like the rest of west africa that they would have otherwise lived in, and the enancipated slaves who made up the settlers were given complete autonomy over their new country, by every reasonable measure, liberia should have been the black america of africa, at least as successful as rhodesia or south africa guven the terrain, the founders even modelled their flag after the flag of the united states, in anticipation of long term success, but instead it went south fast, they got sick with diseases, their crops all failed, they constantly went to war with their neighbours, and now all that came out of liberia was a third world shithole.

    The rest if the slaves who were due to be sent to liberia decided to stay when they heard if how the colony they asked for, all the way down to the exact details regarding the location and supplies sent along with them.

    Look at liberia today, that is what would have happened if america wasnt involved with the african's slave trade.

    How is the trans atlantic slave trade so special that it makes blacks economically unsuccessful, but the slave trades that primarily dealt with white slaves, the romans, ottomans, mongols, barbary empires, etc. didnt produce the same long lasting failures in white people? You know "slav" is the the origin of rhe word "slave", right?

    And if slavery makes an economy successful, then why didnt it work for south america, who took in mire african slaves than north america ever did, and by a long shot, also, wht did it not do the same miracle for the countries of africa, where the slaves were taken and sold from, and most of which continues to practice slavery to this day.

    Its kind of funny that you blame the shortest; smallest, least brutal slave trade in history for economic inequality, but not the slave trades that grew as big as they could, lasted as long as they could, and were completely unrestricted from the enlightenment's views on human rights.

    Reply

  33. I would sugest if the white nationalist position of race realism to br true and proof on why only white civilizations survive unlike other is to be true it still wouldn't mean god damn shit, and you know why? It was because of chance not the universe bestowing white people with higher intelligence. I say this I. Regard to a video by gcp gray which even though not about politics, were the videos on the american pox and animal domestication. He mentioned this one line that stuck out to me which he says "its not that the old world were smarter but that they just so happen to had the resources to be able to create civilizations something the new world did not if it were reversed the same thing would happen" and it made me realize about this whole race realism and iq an wondered if that is the case then it it doesn't prove that whites are more superior to blacks just that it was chance on climate, weather, plate tectonics. It wouldn't mean any more than the question why we are here and what is our purpose? With that question you could assume any answer to the meaning of life but in the end it was made up by you and not objective. I think these people forget that science does prove objective facts but not morality. Or a better example of what I'm saying is this old statement " science could one day show us how we came to be and how life and existence started but it could never or will tell us why? And that question has haunted humans since forever and made us come up with our own meaning on the answer to why but the real problem occurred when they said their answers were not subject but objective.

    Reply

  34. >psychology and 100 year old tradition of IQ group differences is pseudoscince

    since when? argue your point soyboy.

    Reply

  35. "white nationalist want a stale and stagnant society"

    Nigga, we want to colonize the Moon while we listen to agressive synthwave, infact we would have already done that if money have gone to NASA insted of Head Start/Sensitivity training and other failed leftists billion dollar government programs.

    Reply

  36. I… had someone who might've been a White Nationalist, and was definitely a useful idiot for them, dismiss, without examination or real cause, the decades of biological science questioning and undermining the idea of a strict sex binary in humans as pseudoscience. Even though the idea that there aren't two completely discrete sexes in humans, but rather an array of traits that often don't fully line up as either "male" or "female" is currently the mainstream biological view.

    Reply

  37. They say diversification is only happening in white countries but they totally ignore the fact that Africa is the most diverse continent and no ethnic group holds more than 8% of the population.

    But I guess to them, they're all the same ethnic group because they all have dark skin, Fucking retards.

    Reply

  38. 1:26 Also the incredibly biased IQ test had be used by white supremacists in the mid 1900s to justify their racial superiority over blacks.

    IQ were built for French grade school children and modified to make whites look superior later.

    Reply

  39. While I agree with you in everything this video would greatly benefit from links of studies or anything that would showcase the modern understanding of the concepts white nationalists rely on outdated science to prove their point. Can't do much about when they completely dismiss the scientific view, but at least we can use those to debase their supposed "scientific point" when it's outdated.

    Reply

  40. love your work, left desperately need more stuff like this, and less gulag jokes!
    I mean gulag jokes are fun and games, but this is serious stuff. for too long we have been a sort of closed 'elite' club literally pushing out everyone not radical enough out. we marginalized ourselfs out of fear that liberals will coopt radicals. fascists did the exact opposite, knowing all to well that moderates are never a threat to real radicals, they did all they could to attract them and hid among libertarians, conservatists etc. pandering to values shared by mainstream. meanwhile we were arguing if stalin indeed did nothing wrong.
    we got played, cos preserving image of radical, being cool within a group was more important then actual real world effects.
    I really love your work, hope you get more recognition and more people on the left will adopt this sort of stance, it's not betrayal to leftism to point out that mainstream is more threatened by our enemies then us. we can be deeply critical of 'the west' while notice that in reality we are closer to it's stated values then it's supposed right-wing protectors. in the end it's a game, but stakes are high.

    Reply

  41. Here's the thing: just because the actual science doesn't match your liberal agenda doesn't mean that it's ''outdated''. Different genetic populations have evolved differently, so they're genetically different – how is that even a controversial claim? Besides, many of the IQ vs race studies out there have been conducted in environments where members of all racial backgrounds have similar income and similar education. You can blame differences in intelligence on ''racism'', on poverty, on whites, on Trump, on tests, on schools, on teachers and on whatever you want, but at the end of the day, you're just being dishonest and willfully ignorant to the reality of evolution. As for sex, how the fuck does the verbal diarrhea of a bunch of mentally unstable teenage girls on Tumblr qualify for ''updated science''?! Biological sex is reality; what you ''identify as'' is irrelevant. I could identify as a fucking giraffe – that wouldn't warrant for the creation of a new category of ''species identity''!

    The reason why we hate modern art is because, as you said, it has literally degenerated from portraying classic beauty to serving as a vehicle for whatever crazy political or ideological agenda the left has decided to push this week. Western art has always evolved in a linear fashion, guided by more or less universal criteria for beauty and has thus formed a long tradition of greatness and glory. If you look at classical visual art, you'll notice that it accurately represents reality in a way that requires mastery and talent, and its value is inherent: it comes from the perfection that lies within it, instilled by the creators who became experts of their craft after a lifetime of study and practice. Modern art has none of that. It's little more than garbage (in some cases literally) assembled by incompetent wannabe ''artists'' who justify their pitiful creations by attributing external ideas to them, and those ideas are usually always about women's rights, gay/trans right, the environment or the problems with capitalism. Therefore, modern art has no real value, as it is nothing more than a collection of atrociously ugly artifacts designed to market liberal propaganda.

    I don't know why leftists can't differentiate change from progress. Just because a society changes doesn't mean that it does in a good way; and just because we want to preserve the good things in our societies doesn't mean that we want them to stagnate. White nationalists don't hate the West; we hate what the West has become: a weak and crippled civilization, paralyzed by cultural masochism and racial white guilt, divided by multiculturalism and racial heterogeneity, torn by the conflicts resulting from mass immigration from incompatible and inferior cultures, and slowly dying at the hands of unbridled moral degeneracy. The idea that replacing Western people (the people who built the greatest civilization in human history) with lazy, uneducated, unemployable, violent, low IQ, useless, diseased and dirty savages from the world's worst shitholes is somehow a good thing is cancer and is also the main reason why the West is dying, which is what we hate: we hate the reality of seeing the greatest human civilization succumb to its own people's unwillingness to fight for it.

    Reply

  42. I agree white nationalists do hate the west so much that they will even move to where they are a minority in order to escape it. Its sheer madness.

    Reply

  43. Your arguments is like saying nature lovers really absolutely hate nature because they dont want to be infected by parasites, lose their children to influenza or get get killed by falling wood in a forest during a storm.

    Reply

  44. i love the content of your videos, but i do feel like you tend to rush a bit and stumble over your words when you speak? (i tend to have that issue too) anyway, i love the use of editing and stock footage, it makes whatever you release feel professional. keep up the good work!

    Reply

  45. I've debated so many times with white nationalist over race, iQ, and the genetic interpretations of iQ. It's quite funny, because they target people who aren't knowledgeable on the debate, But when I come along and they realize that I actually know what I'm talking about.. they avoid debating me(where's the enthusiasm??). I've clowned so many white nationalist on this discussion that it's not even funny anymore. You want to discuss iQ, talk to me, 🤷 let's discuss it.

    Reply

  46. All anybody needs to know about IQ is that Stephen Hawking never belonged to Mensa. No true genius ever feels the need to brag about a score on a test.

    Reply

  47. I assume when you mentioned the two videoes on the discussion of art those had annotations, but since youtube has removed those and I'm just seeing this video now I can't access them. What were those two videoes can you update the description with links? would help for people wanting to learn more about that but coming to the video too late.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *